HungV
Senior Addict
Posts: 258
|
Post by HungV on Jul 20, 2012 21:16:45 GMT -5
if i'm not wrong , Asian writers using indirect sentences and keep on telling and describe in every detail; otherwise, Western writers tend on narrating the stories directly by the way they've seen. You should read the 2 versions and you probably find out the differences.
|
|
|
Post by sageuk on Jul 20, 2012 23:02:37 GMT -5
@bo She mentioned that in the comments section plus there are photos of her uploaded on the site during a trip to Korea
|
|
|
Post by TheBo on Jul 24, 2012 4:52:01 GMT -5
lol okay, mannschaft is a poet. I can tell. He always goes for the romantic explanation. (I mean romance as in storytelling, not love life)
Sageuk, on the other hand, is a student of the scientific method.
Bo
|
|
HungV
Senior Addict
Posts: 258
|
Post by HungV on Jul 24, 2012 5:36:37 GMT -5
a poet ?? and a story telling ?? not really Bo, I'm a leader 1 of my class presentation team , my work is to write and defend team's thesis in front of our classmates , most projects are about science and traditional literatures...thats why I'm good as explanation.
|
|
|
Post by sageuk on Jul 24, 2012 6:38:52 GMT -5
What ya mean by that Bo?
|
|
|
Post by TheBo on Jul 24, 2012 9:02:45 GMT -5
I was looking at your answers and comparing them. Mannschaft went for the poetic explanation, thinking about why someone would answer in such a way to make you think they were Asian. Whereas sageuk went right to the source and investigated the information the party actually gave about herself.
Romance versus science. Both come up with valid, useful explanations. Being romantic doesn't preclude being scientific, and being scientific doesn't preclude your being romantic. You guys should not get yourselves into a twist, I wasn't insulting anyone. Or at least, I wasn't TRYING to... ;D
|
|