|
Post by paintballphil on Oct 20, 2004 18:08:20 GMT -5
that final episode was awesome. throughout the series ( i started watching at 82) i started rooting for cch. im glad that no one killed him, and that he died of old age. cch has to be the greatest warrior in aow. not only did nobody stand in his way for his greedy thirst for power , but he couldnt be killed. Long live cch as the baddest warrior in the age of warriors. ;D
|
|
|
Post by IAPD3000 on Oct 28, 2004 10:55:51 GMT -5
Amen to that, son!
|
|
|
Post by seven stars on Oct 29, 2004 14:46:43 GMT -5
I think that you have to recognize that the stage was set for CCH by the times in which he rose to power. The Emperor's mistrust for KDS and Dobang was initially fueled by the events of Yi Ui-Bang, Yi Ko and the Chungs revolution and subsequent vying for mastery.
CCH made a lasting impression, but one has to wonder whether or not he could have done this 10 - 15 years earlier than he did. If you had seen the earlier episodes, my guess is that your answer would be no. The Archfiend was most menacing as Yi Ui-Bang's loyal right hand, and with Yi Ko, Che Won and Chung Jung Bu around, no one would have sat by idly while CCH pressed for power.
Go back and watch from the beginning. Your opinion may change.
|
|
|
Post by luvarchfiend on Oct 30, 2004 17:54:15 GMT -5
I think that you have to recognize that the stage was set for CCH by the times in which he rose to power. The Emperor's mistrust for KDS and Dobang was initially fueled by the events of Yi Ui-Bang, Yi Ko and the Chungs revolution and subsequent vying for mastery. CCH made a lasting impression, but one has to wonder whether or not he could have done this 10 - 15 years earlier than he did. If you had seen the earlier episodes, my guess is that your answer would be no. The Archfiend was most menacing as Yi Ui-Bang's loyal right hand, and with Yi Ko, Che Won and Chung Jung Bu around, no one would have sat by idly while CCH pressed for power. Go back and watch from the beginning. Your opinion may change. i agree seven stars. i think timing had a lot to do with cch's rise and stay in power. there just weren't any of the real bad@ss warriors around to challenge him and the government had deteriorated to am all time low.
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboy on Oct 30, 2004 20:04:41 GMT -5
i agree seven stars. i think timing had a lot to do with cch's rise and stay in power. there just weren't any of the real bad@ss warriors around to challenge him and the government had deteriorated to am all time low. Is brownnosing really nessessary to get your point across? I think there were plent of warriors who could have taken him down. But unfortunately cch had that rag seal that said all who oppose the emperors authority is an act of treason.
|
|
|
Post by luvarchfiend on Oct 30, 2004 21:17:11 GMT -5
Is brownnosing really nessessary to get your point across? I think there were plent of warriors who could have taken him down. But unfortunately cch had that rag seal that said all who oppose the emperors authority is an act of treason. no, and neither is rudeness. and acknowledging that i agree with a fellow board member is hardly brown-nosing. (sorry moderators for being off topic)....and that isn't brown-nosing either.
|
|
|
Post by The cowboy on Oct 31, 2004 6:51:13 GMT -5
and acknowledging that i agree with a fellow board member is hardly brown-nosing. It is when you do it say, 100% of the time. [Anyways back on topic] you say there were no "bad@ss warriors" to help out. But i disagree, there was Brue,Archfiend,all his merry men. The reason the "government" was at an all time low,was because the emperor didnt have enough courage to strip power from cch.
|
|
|
Post by Eowyn on Oct 31, 2004 19:52:13 GMT -5
WELL.... I AGREE WITH LUVARCHFIEND!
WHY ALL THIS RUDENESS ON THE BOARD, AS WELL AS DISGUSTING GUEST NAMES?
|
|
|
Post by The cowboy on Oct 31, 2004 21:26:21 GMT -5
WELL.... I AGREE WITH LUVARCHFIEND! WHY ALL THIS RUDENESS ON THE BOARD, AS WELL AS DISGUSTING GUEST NAMES? How is the Name The Cowboy discusting in any way shape or form? I cant help being who i am. I am a proud texan like bush so i guess your gonna have to get use to that honey. I can see this yank brownnosing disease is might right infectious. I cant now quite comprehend how your mood swings is in any way related to the Topic. "You gotta love choi choon-hon" Thats one might horse kick to the head. I can honestly say i kinda like that guy abit. The truth of the matter. If The emperor had more faith and trusted in Archfiend. I think you would have seen a very dead cch and a self reflective Archfiend back in his town.
|
|
|
Post by luvarchfiend on Nov 1, 2004 22:54:43 GMT -5
WELL.... I AGREE WITH LUVARCHFIEND! WHY ALL THIS RUDENESS ON THE BOARD, AS WELL AS DISGUSTING GUEST NAMES? thank you eowyn. and i couldn't AGREE more about the rudeness and names. the statement i made about no more bad@ss warriors was referring to the time after the elimination of the archfiend, choi bu, brue and his other followers. cch was almost guaranteed success as he was never approached by master duduel to relieve the people from distress.
|
|
|
Post by The Cowboy on Nov 2, 2004 2:04:41 GMT -5
i couldn't AGREE more about the rudeness and names. the statement i made about no more bad@ss warriors was referring to the time after the elimination of the archfiend, choi bu, brue and his other followers. cch was almost guaranteed success as he was never approached by master duduel to relieve the people from distress. dont hate me or my name because i am a texan. I love my state and i support Bush. My golly goshness i for one have never seen such a brown nose as big as yours babe. Now on to the point. Well now you never pointed out any details on the last post you made. So i only could asume that there were plenty of "bad@ss warriors" around. But since now you say there werent none,well i can only guess as to what you were trying to get at. The emperor had plenty of power if he had just plum well used it. cch would have been quite weak had the emporor enforced something on him. You catch my drift dontya honey bones. [glow=red,2,300]bush will rule[/glow]
|
|
|
Post by Eowyn on Nov 2, 2004 8:35:28 GMT -5
Moderators, please consider closing this thread -
It seems this smug cowboy character is dragging in politics as well as insults.
As for me, I'm done with this subject and will bandy words no more.
|
|
luvarchfiend unlogged
Guest
|
Post by luvarchfiend unlogged on Nov 2, 2004 9:00:03 GMT -5
excellent suggestion.
and the same goes for me....i am finished with this.
|
|
Skinz dont feel like loggin
Guest
|
Post by Skinz dont feel like loggin on Nov 2, 2004 15:11:19 GMT -5
Just saw this post while browsing and man what the hell was going on here. Guess someone slipped in and decided to cause havoc on people for no reason at all. First of all cowboy, the legitmacy of the king and royal family was shattered by the rebellion in 1170. Myong Jong was put on the throne by the warriors so his reign was illegitimate from the beginning and so was the others. So to say if the emperor had courage he would've strip CCH of his power is just unrealistic. You need more than courage if the military leader is against the emperor. Who would he have on his side? Royal Officials? And the emperor DID have faith in the archfiend in the beginning. Isn't that why he brought him back to kill KDS? It was the Archfiend who was planning to take over the throne and bring back the shilla empire. So who fault was that? And quit with all these insults on people. If you want to have a decent conversation on a topic at least act like you have some maturity instead of making yourself look like a total fool. I GOT YA BACK LUVARCHFIEND AND EOWYN ;D ERADICATE CHILDISH POSTS FOREVER HA HA HA!!!!
|
|
|
Post by The cowboy on Nov 2, 2004 20:09:57 GMT -5
First of all cowboy, the legitmacy of the king and royal family was shattered by the rebellion in 1170. Myong Jong was put on the throne by the warriors so his reign was illegitimate from the beginning and so was the others. So to say if the emperor had courage he would've strip CCH of his power is just unrealistic. You need more than courage if the military leader is against the emperor. Who would he have on his side? Royal Officials? And the emperor DID have faith in the archfiend in the beginning. Isn't that why he brought him back to kill KDS? It was the Archfiend who was planning to take over the throne and bring back the shilla empire. So who fault was that? And quit with all these insults on people. If you want to have a decent conversation on a topic at least act like you have some maturity instead of making yourself look like a total fool. I GOT YA BACK LUVARCHFIEND AND EOWYN ;D ERADICATE CHILDISH POSTS FOREVER HA HA HA!!!! Woh woh woh. First of all don't you miss interpret my words. Its like misinterpreting the bible son. Secondly the question was never about the legitamacy of the emperor. It was about wether or not there were "badass warriors" around to challenge cch. How is it unrealistic for an emperor to stand up to someone challenging the throne? It would be unrealistic if the emperor was so scared that he did nothingthing and just watched. It is very realistic to use royal powers to punish someone that threatens the throne. You should know from the series that with money and power. You can have anyone on yourside. Mentaly Archfiend may have wanted the throne. But in his heart he knew it was a wrong and treasonous act. So he decided it was best to protect it instead. Even when he faltered abit. He thought about it. Wanted to go home and start over again. On the topic of maturity. you are the foolish one not me. Why must you hate simply because i like bush and i am texan. Texans are proud people and if you cant accept that well too bad. If you have LUVARCHFIEND AND EOWYN sattled backs. i bet you have their belted fronts too? Well if there is an eradication of childish posts. We can start with yours Skinzy boy.
|
|