|
Post by Soju on Jun 20, 2006 21:39:08 GMT -5
With all the characters in this show, I sure hope I can get a handle on all the various relationships. There's always a learning curve with the characters on a new drama, but this one seems to be a little steeper than usual.
Several of the details made me think of 'Rosy Life'. I wonder if it will follow a similar type of story.
As a side note, I would someday like to see Kwon Hae-hyo as the star, rather than as the friend/assistant/business associate roles he always seems to play. The closest I've seen was 'To Be with You', but he almost disappeared toward the end of that one.
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Jun 21, 2006 10:47:58 GMT -5
Did this start already? Goshdarnit. And I'm supposed to be the moderator.
|
|
|
Post by galacticchick on Jun 21, 2006 11:56:20 GMT -5
Ditto, I'm confused, what did this replace?
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Jun 21, 2006 11:57:25 GMT -5
GC, it's supposed to replace "Farewell to Sorrow," I think, which I've gathered ended (rather abruptly) Monday night.
|
|
|
Post by galacticchick on Jun 21, 2006 11:58:59 GMT -5
I see, well guess we'll have to start from episode 3.
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Jun 21, 2006 12:09:58 GMT -5
No, 2, right? If the first episode was Tuesday, I mean, then ep 2 will be next Monday.
|
|
|
Post by TheBo on Jun 21, 2006 14:59:15 GMT -5
The show is supposed to have started last night at 8 p.m. Monday and Tuesday 8 p.m., with repeats supposedly airing on Tuesday and Wednesday at 1:30 p.m. All times are approximate and never to be trusted.
So I just checked my tape, and yes, "Thanks" something or other aired an episode last night. So next Monday will be episode #2.
I've been taping "Farewell" from 1:20 p.m. to 3:00 p.m. and usually had no problem. Except with reception. Oddly, evening reception seems to work better.
Bo
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Jun 21, 2006 16:54:56 GMT -5
Talking about reception (OT), my tape of "Bizarre Bunch" was great last night ... for the first 15 minutes. Then it got more and more unwatchable. So obviously there is no one good position for my frackin' antenna.
I wonder how it will work for (back on topic) "Thanks for the Gumball, Popeye," or whatever this is called.
|
|
|
Post by ginnycat5 on Jun 21, 2006 17:25:23 GMT -5
I'm still holding the darn thing on my knees, sometime horizontal works better and sometimes vertical, so I have to keep shifting it.
|
|
|
Post by Lucy on Jun 21, 2006 17:39:11 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by ginnycat5 on Jun 21, 2006 17:56:36 GMT -5
LOL, Lucy! Was the younger boy the same one as in MSMD? (Your guy's son ) He even shouted once instead of talking.
|
|
|
Post by Ducky on Jun 21, 2006 18:12:21 GMT -5
So as far as I can tell the first thoughts on this show are: - Scheduling
- Confusion &
- Reception....
Not necessarily in that order......
|
|
|
Post by ginnycat5 on Jun 22, 2006 13:48:42 GMT -5
The husband with the camera is looking so irresponsible-yuk! Spending money they don't have on more toys for himself and lightly suggesting paying $100 for food that she can save if she does it herself. And smoking and hiding it. Hope he put out the cigarette before closing the drawer. She finds him charming tho-he made her smile even tho he came home late and drunk.
|
|
|
Post by ginnycat5 on Jun 22, 2006 13:50:39 GMT -5
I don't think holding the TV antenna on my knees at work while the VCR is taping at home will help me that much, ginny. Guess not, Lucy, not without telekinesis. And distant viewing to check on reception.
|
|
|
Post by Soju on Jun 22, 2006 22:11:27 GMT -5
The husband with the camera is looking so irresponsible-yuk! Spending money they don't have on more toys for himself I once worked with a guy who did the same thing: always buying these 'collectable' cameras. I didn't much like him, but after the Christmas party one year, I tried to be nice and asked him "So, what are you doing this Christmas?" He answered, "No Christmas for us this year. No money, and no credit." I thought, "Your own fault for buying all those useless cameras."
|
|